Perspective2 min read

AI patient-reply study: measure response speed and workload separately

New JAMA Network Open findings distinguish adopting AI drafts from using them. What a clinic manager should measure before expanding a pilot.

Prepared by the NADALI editorial team using AI

AI illustration: a person compares two fictional paper records beside a calculator; no patient data.
Nadali — reused original AI-generated editorial illustration created with OpenAI image generation · AI-generated editorial illustration; used under OpenAI Terms of Use; no claim of exclusivity or copyright registration · 1440 × 960

Author: Nadali. Prepared with AI assistance.

A new publication, not a new launch

On October 30, JAMA Network Open published a study of AI-drafted patient replies at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. It analyzed first responses from 2023–2025; the Epic tool was rolled out in 2024.

The journal’s announcement reports that adoption was associated with longer turnaround, while using a draft for a particular message was associated with shorter turnaround. No overall reduction in after-hours responses was found.

This single-center observational evidence establishes neither causation nor payroll savings. Time until a first reply is not staff working time; the study does not cover all subsequent exchanges.

Who benefits

Clinic owners or operations managers assessing a messaging-assistance pilot. Nadali’s practical takeaway: do not approve expansion on a speed metric alone.

What to add to your checks

This is an editorial checking sequence, not the study protocol or medical guidance:

  1. Separate three groups: before adoption, after adoption without using a draft, and after adoption with draft use. Compare enquiries of similar complexity.
  2. Record patient waiting time, active preparation and review time, and replies outside the agreed schedule separately.
  3. Include corrections and follow-up enquiries. A quickly sent response does not necessarily resolve the issue.
  4. Decide in advance who assesses quality and authorizes further use. Do not treat this study as grounds for automatically sending medical replies.

Our small-pilot worksheet can help organize measurement. Keep your working records free of unnecessary personal information and within an approved environment.

Availability and limits

The research article is publicly accessible. It does not establish access to the described tool, integration or terms in your clinic. Nadali has not tested the product or assessed patient records; sources were read on November 3, 2026.

The cover is a reused conceptual Nadali AI illustration: fictional records, not study results or medical data. 

Sources and verification

  1. JAMA Network Open: AI-Generated Draft Response Tool, Message Turnaround Time, and After-Hours Replies Among Health Care Professionals; October 30, 2026 ↗
    Source checked: 2026-11-03
  2. JAMA Network media release, October 30, 2026 ↗
    Source checked: 2026-11-03